Brexit and Political Personality:
The Psychological Profiles of Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn


De Landtsheer C.,

University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, christl.delandtsheer@uantwerpen.be

Hollander Sh.,

University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, shana.hollander@hotmail.com

Maene P.,

University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium, peter.maene@teltnet.be



DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.06.09


For citation:

De Landtsheer C., Hollander Sh., Maene P. Brexit and Political Personality: The Psychological Profiles of Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 6. P. 122-136. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.06.09



Abstract

This article focuses on the role of personality in the case of Brexit, the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union on January 31, 2020. A decisive step in Brexit were the general elections on December 12, 2019, in which Boris Johnson, Conservative Prime Minister of the UK and advocate of Brexit, defeated Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the Labour Party and ‘neutral’ about Brexit. Political psychology considers personality as a major factor in political developments. This article presents the results of an assessment of the personalities of Johnson and Corbyn, and it argues that the personality of these key players influenced the Brexit process. The analysis is based on the theory and methods of Immelman, Immelman & Steinberg, and Mastenbroek. Our findings suggest that Johnson’s charismatic personality, his dominant leadership style, and his negotiating skills contributed to his electoral victory and to the realization of Brexit. Johnson profited from Corbyn’s lack of personal charisma and from his undecisive and divisive leadership regarding Brexit. 

Keywords
UK, Brexit, European Union, MIDC, profiling, political psychology, Boris Johnson, Jeremy Corbyn.


References

Byman D., Pollack K. 2001. Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back. – International Security. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 107-146. https://10.1162/01622880151091916

Bower T. 2019. Dangerous Hero Corbyn's Ruthless Plot for Power. London: William Collins.

De Landtsheer C., De Sutter P. 2011. – De Clash der Titanen. Brussel: ASP.

Dorey P. 2017. Jeremy Corbyn Confounds His Critics: Explaining the Labour Party's Remarkable Resurgence in the 2017 Election. – British Politics. No. 12. P. 308-334. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-017-0058-4

Dorey P., Denham A. 2016. The Longest Suicide Vote in History: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015. – British Politics. Vol. 11 No. 3. P. 259-282. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0

Hermann M.G. 1987. Assessing the Foreign Policy Role Orientations of Sub-Saharan African Leaders. – Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. Ed. by S.G. Walker. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. P. 161-198.

Immelman A. 1998. The Political Personalities of 1996 U.S. Presidential Candidates Bill Clinton and Bob Dole. – The Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 335 -366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90035-2

Immelman A. 2004a. MIDC Inventory. St. Joseph, MN: Saint John’s University.

Immelman A. 2004b. Manual (and Interpretation). St. Joseph, MN: Saint John’s University.

Immelman A. 2004c. Profile Form Immelman. St. Joseph, MN: Saint John’s University.

Immelman A. 2004d. Profile Template Immelman. St. Joseph, MN: Saint John’s University.

Immelman A. 2004e. Scales and Gradations Immelman. St. Joseph, MN: Saint John’s University.

Immelman A. 2004f. Score Sheet Immelman. St. Joseph, MN: Saint John’s University.

Immelman A. 2004g. Millon Inventory of Diagnostic Criteria. Manual–II–revised Scoring Instructions. St. Joseph, MN: Saint John’s University.

Immelman A. 2019. Projecting the Winner of the 2020 Presidential Election: The Personal Electability Index. URL: http://personality-politics.org/projecting-the-winner-of-the-2020-presidential-election-the-person­al-electability-index (accessed 03.03.2021).

Immelman A., Steinberg B. 2008. Theoretical Links Between Personality Patterns and Leadership Style. St. Joseph, MN: Saint John’s University.

Martill B., Staiger U. 2018. Brexit and Beyond: Rethinking the Futures of Europe. United Kingdom: UCL Press.

Mastenbroek W. 1989. Negotiate. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Middelhoff J. et al. 2017. Complex Political Decision-Making: Leadership, Legitimacy and communication. London and New York: Routledge Francis and Taylor Group. (Ch. 2 – Political Personality and Complex Decision-Making: The Psychological Profile and Leadership Style of Angela Merkel, the World's Most Powerful Woman. P. 122-143.).

Millon Th., Davis R.O. 1996. Disorders of Personality: Dsm-IV and Beyond. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Post J.M. 1991. Saddam Hussein of Iraq: A Political Psychology Profile. – Political Psychology. No. 12. P. 279-289. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791465

Renshon S.A. 1996. High Hopes: The Clinton Presidency and the Politics of Ambition. New York: New York University Press.

Richards S. 2016. Leadership, Loyalty and the Rise of Jeremy Corbyn. – The Political Quarterly. Vol. 87. No.1. P. 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12221

Shestopal E. (ed.) 2016. New Trends in Russian Political Mentality: Putin 3.0. Lanham-Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books.

Simonton D.K. 1988. Age and Outstanding Achievement: What Do We Know after a Century of Research? – Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 104. No. 2. P. 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.104.2.251

Strack S. 1997. The PACL: Gauging Normal Personality Styles. – The Millon Inventories: Clinical and Personality Assessment. Ed. by T. Millon. New York: Guilford. P. 477-497.

Strelets I. 2013. Boris Yeltsin, Vladimir Putin, Dmitry Medvedev: A Political Psychology Analysis of Presidential Personalities. – Citizens and Leaders in a Comparative Perspective: What Can Political Psychology Tell Us About Recent Trends and Events in Politics. Ed. by E. Shestopal. Moscow: Moscow University Press. P. 217-222.

Winter D.G. 2005. Things I've Learned About Personality from Studying Political Leaders at a Distance. – Journal of Рersonality. Vol. 73. No. 3. P. 557-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00321.x 

Content No. 6, 2021

See also:



Subdiscipline: Political psychology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4

Pavlov N.V.,
Are diplomats to master psychology?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No4


Theme of the issue: Scientific schools. Political psychology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

Suvakovic U.,
Political parties as traditional mechanisms of representation in modern societies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2

Susloparova Ye.A.,
Great Britain: Reforms and Modernization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No3

 
 

Archive

   2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991