.jpg)
printPolitical branding:
turning to symbolic policy
Pushkaryova G.V.,
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, pushkarjeva@spa.msu.ru
elibrary_id: 76897 | ORCID: 0000-0003-1567-5652 | RESEARCHER_ID: AAB-2181-2022
Article received: 2021.08.13 16:16. Accepted: 2022.03.25 16:16
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.04.08
For citation:
Pushkaryova G.V. Political branding: turning to symbolic policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 4. P. 94-107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.04.08
Abstract
Political branding has traditionally been viewed as a sub-discipline of political marketing. This paper proposes to go beyond the marketing approach and consider political branding as a kind of symbolic politics. Symbolic politics as a theoretical and methodological direction allows, first of all, to raise the question of expanding the field of application of political branding as a means of political influence. If, within the framework of the marketing paradigm, political branding is considered as a competitive tool mainly in electoral processes, then the inclusion of political branding in the subject field of symbolic politics allows us to raise the question of its use to solve a wider range of political tasks, including the formation of national identity, trust in public authorities, increasing the prestige of certain forms of civic activity, etc. The appeal of the theoretical and methodological potential of symbolic politics also allows us to take a different look at the very process of constructing political brands. If the marketing approach requires political brand managers to focus on a rational person who is aware of his needs, striving for maximum benefit, able to evaluate the results of his actions, then the paradigm of symbolic politics tells the creators of political brands that the political preferences of citizens are not so much the result of rational calculation, but rather a consequence of the assimilated mythologemes and ideologemes. In the paper, a political brand is defined as a recognizable and easily distinguishable symbol that can attract attention and act as a stimulus that triggers certain cognitive and emotional processes in the psyche. The defining role in the creation of political brands of such symbolic constructs as mythologemes and ideologemes is substantiated. Brand competition is seen as a battling of political forces for appropriation of the right to include myths and value judgments that are popular in mass consciousness in the brand being created. The conditions of “burnout” of a political brand are revealed. Attention is drawn to the use of symbolic mechanisms in the policy of challenging and discrediting the brands of political rivals.
Keywords
political brand, political branding, political marketing, symbolic policy, symbolic universe, mythologemes, ideologemes, anti-brand.
References
Busby, R., & Cronshaw, S. (2015). Political branding: the Tea party and its use of participation branding. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1-2), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990850
Edelman, M. (1971). Politics as symbolic action. Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago: Markham publishing company.
Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
Farhan, A., & Ahmad, A. (2016). A review of political branding research. Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review, 4(2), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.35609/gjbssr.2016.4.2(4)
rench, A., & Smith, G. (2010). Measuring political brand equity: a consumer oriented approach. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 460-477. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020534
Guzmán, F., Paswan, A.K., & Van Steenburg, E. (2015). Self-referencing and political candidate brands: a congruency perspective. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1-2), 175-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990837
Kavanagh, D. (1995). Election campaigning: the new marketing of politics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Needham, C. (2005). Brand leaders: Clinton, Blair and the limitations of the permanent campaign. Political Studies, 53(2), 343-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00532.x
Needham, C. (2006). Brands and political loyalty. Journal of Brand Management, 13, 178-187. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540260
Newman, B. (Ed.) (1999). Handbook of political marketing. London: Sage Publications.
Nielsen, W. (2016). Measuring political brands: an art and a science of mapping the mind. Journal of Political Marketing, 15(1), 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959682
Pich, Ch., & Newman, B. (2020). Evolution of political branding: typologies, diverse settings and future research. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(1-2), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2019.1680932
Pich, Ch., & Newman, B.I. (2021). Political branding: more than parties, leaders and policies. Abingdon: Routledge.
Schneider, H. (2004). Branding in politics. Journal of Political Marketing, 3(3), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v03n03_03
Smith, G., & French, A. (2009). The political brand: a consumer perspective. Marketing Theory, 9(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593109103068
Speed, R., Butler, P., & Collins, N. (2015). Human branding in political marketing: applying contemporary branding thought to political parties and their leaders. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1-2), 129-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.990833
Torres-Spelliscy, C. (2019). Political brands. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1995). Social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. (Russ. ed.: Berger, P., & Luckman, T. Sotsial’noye konstruirovaniye real’nosti: traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. Moscow: Medium).
Borisov, I.V. (2009). Rossiyskaya geral’dika. Proiskhozhdeniye. Istoriya. Sovremennost’ Istochnikovedeniye [Russian heraldry. Origin. History. Modernity Source study]. Moscow: EKSMO. (In Russ.)
Cassirer, E. (1988). An essay on man. An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. (Russ. ed.: Cassirer, E. Opyt o cheloveke: vvedeniye v filosofiyu chelovecheskoy kul’tury. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii. Moscow: Progress. P. 3-30).
Dvoinin, A. (2005). Psychological study of the phenomenon of faith. Development of Personality, 2. (In Russ.) URL: http://rl-online.ru/articles/2-05/328.html (accessed: 01.08.2021).
Fedorchenko, S.N. (2012). Technologies of political symbolism of “color revolutions”: international experience. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University, 4, 135-155.
Goffman, E. (2003). Frame analysis an essay on the organization of experience. (Russ. ed.: Goffman, E. Analiz freimov: esse ob organizatsii povsednevnogo opyta. Moscow: Institute of Sociology, RAS; Institute of the Public Opinion Foundation).
Granovskaya, R. (2010). Psikhologiya very [Psychology of faith]. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)
Grishin, O.E. (2007). Party branding and political symbols. Discourse-P, 1, 147-149. (In Russ.)
Kolonitsky, B.I. (2012). Simvoly vlasti i bor’ba za vlast’: k izucheniyu politicheskoy kul’tury rossiyskoy revolyutsii 1917 goda [Symbols of power and the struggle for power: toward a study of the political culture of the 1917 Russian revolution]. St. Petersburg: Faces of Russia. (In Russ.)
Kotler, F. (2006) A framework for marketing management. (Russ. ed.: Kotler F. Marketing menedzhment. St. Petersburg: Piter).
Losev, A.F. (1995). Problema simvola i realisticheskoye iskusstvo [The problem of the symbol and realistic art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
Malinova, O.Yu. (2010). Symbolic politics and the construction of macro-political identity in Post-Soviet Russia. Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 90-105. (In Russ.)
Malinova, O.Yu. (2017). Commemoration of historical events as a tool of symbolic politics: possibilities of comparative analysis. Polity, 4, 6-22. (In Russ.)
Malinova, O.Yu. (2012). Symbolic politics: contours of the problem field. In: O.Yu. Malinova (Ed.), Symbolic politics, 1 (pp. 5-16). Moscow: INION RAN. (In Russ.)
Malinova, O.Yu. (2013). Konstruirovaniye smyslov: Issledovaniye simvolicheskoy politiki v sovremennoy Rossii [Constructing meanings: a study of symbolic politics in contemporary Russia]. Moscow: INION RAN. (In Russ.)
Miller, A.I., & Efremenko, D.V. (Ed.) (2020). Politika pamyati v sovremennoy Rossii i stranakh Vostochnoy Yevropy. Aktory, instituty, narrativy [The politics of memory in modern Russia and the countries of Eastern Europe. Actors, institutions, narratives]. St. Petersburg: EUSP Press. (In Russ.)
Potseluev, S.P. (1999). Symbolic politics: a constellation of concepts for an approach to the problem. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 62-75. (In Russ.)
Pushkareva, G.V. (2015). Political beliefs of a personality. Social Sciences and Contemporary World Journal, 4, 111-120. (In Russ.)
Pushkareva, G.V. (2020). The symbolic space of public administration. Political Science (RU), 2, 183-203. (In Russ.) http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.02.09
Spatkay, L.V. (2005). Geral’dika stran Mira: Yevropa [Heraldry of the World: Europe]. Minsk: Amalfeya.
Ustinova, M.V. (2017). Features of branding of political movements in the context of a modern communication society. Business and design review, 1(3), 7.
Vakhshtayn, V.S. (2011). Analysis of voting frames. An essay on the organization of electoral experience. Russian Sociological Review, 10(1-2), 114-136. (In Russ.)
Volodenkov, S.V. (2010). Political branding in contemporary Russia. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science, 6, 23-30. (In Russ.)
Yanow, D., & Van Hulst, M. (2011). The Political/Process Promise of Policy Framing. Russian Sociological Review, 10(1-2), 87-113. (In Russ.)
Content No. 4, 2022
See also:
Nezhdanov D.V., Rusakova O.F.,
«Political market» as system-forming metaphor of modern political-science discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No4
Nedyak I.L.,
Political marketing. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3
Pushkaryova G.V.,
Ideas and Values as a Method of Constructing Symbolic Space of the National Identity. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No5
Ilyasov F.N.,
Political Marketing, or How to Sell a Leader. – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No5
Matveychev O.A.,
Russian Market of Political Technologies: Stages of Formation and Prospects of Development. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No2
.jpg)
.jpg)