.jpg)
printRussia:
changing the usual way of acquiring the status of a great power
Shakhalilov Sh.Sh.,
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, Timur7628@mail.ru
elibrary_id: 546845 | ORCID: 0000-0003-0138-0001 |
Article received: 2021.06.06. Accepted: 2022.03.25
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.05.10
Rubric: Russia today
For citation:
Shakhalilov Sh.Sh. Russia: changing the usual way of acquiring the status of a great power. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 5. P. 137-150. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.05.10
Abstract
One of the manifestations of the crisis of the liberal order is the emergence of new players seeking too participate in the management of international affairs. This presents a threat to the United States and its allies which risk losing their dominant position in the world. Unwillingly, the Western powers are increasing the pressure on their opponents, using economic sanctions, information attacks, surrounding their territories with military bases. This situation poses a dilemma for Non-western States: either to submit to the pressure of the collective West, or to fight for equal international relations. Russia has chosen the second path. The article substantiates the motives for such a choice, the tools for conducting a sovereign policy, which largely depend on the modernization of the Russian armed forces. It is designed to balance the military power of Western powers, to open up prospects for turning Russia into one of the poles of power and influence in the modern world. Piper reveals the role of military power today, its advantages in comparison with economic opportunities. One-sided assessments of the role of military power, which emerged in the wake of the triumph of liberalism, are subjected to critical analysis. The reasons for Russia’s dissatisfaction with the current order and the nature of its differences with the West are revealed. The main of them is that the rules and norms of the current world order close the way for a strong and independent Russia. Attention is drawn to the fundamental change in Russia’s usual order of acquiring the status of a world power. Unlike the western experience, which based on economic foundations, it puts in first place military might. The advantages that Russia receives from its military power are shown. The article reveals the meaning of Russia’s asymmetric balancing of the military power of the collective West, which consists in achieving this goal with minimal costs. Russia have modernized its armed forces and now can not only guarantee national security, but maintain a strategic balance of power with the West.
Keywords
asymmetric balancing, military power, geopolitical interests, liberal unipolar order, international security, great power, multipolarity, strategic parity.
References
Allison, G. (2017). America and Russia: back to basics. The National Interest, 14.08. https://www.nationalinterest.org/feature/america-russia-back-basics-21901?page=show
Brooks, St.G., Wohlforth, W.C. (2016). The rise and fall the great powers in twenty-first century. China’s rise and fate of Americas global position. Quarterly Journal: International Security, 40(3), 7-53. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00225
Giegerich, B., Childs, N., & Hackett, J. (2018). Military capability and international status. IISS. Military Balance Blog, 4.07. https://www.iiss.org/blogs/military-balance/2018/07/military-capability-and-international-status
Ikenberry, G.J. (2005). Power and liberal order: America’s postwar world order in transition. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 5(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.193/trap/Ici112
Ikenberry, G.J. (2017). The plot against American foreign policy. Can the Liberal Order Survive? Foreign Affairs, 96(3), 2-9. https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/gji3/files/may-june_2017_foreign_affairs.pdf
Ikenberry, G.J. (2018). Why the liberal world order will survive. Ethics & International Affairs, 32(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/So89267948000072
Ikenberry, G.J., Mastanduno, M., & Wohlforth, W.C. (2009). Introduction: unipolarity, state behavior and systemic consequences. World Politics, 61(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004388710900001X
Inboden, W. (2018). 10 reasons US military strength remains essential. The Hill, 23.12. https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/421970-10-reasons-us-military-strength-remains-essential
Katz, M.N. (2018). Great powers in the twenty-first century. Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 10, 122-133. https://www.cirsd.org/en/horizons/horizons-winter-2018-issueno-10/great-powers-in-the-twenty-first-century
Kofman, M. (2018). Great power competition in the 21st century. Valdai Papers, 86, 21.06. https://valdaiclub.com/a/valdai-papers/great-power-competition-in-21st-century
Kofman, M., & Conolly, R. (2019). Why Russian military expenditure is much higher than commonly understood (as is China’s)? War on the Rocks. Texas National Security Review, 16.12. https://warontherocks.com/2019/12/why-russian-military-expenditure-is-much-higher-than-commonly-understood-as-is-chinas
Lieven, A. (2017). Don’t fear the new nationalism. The National Interest, 25.06. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/dont-fear-the-new-nationalism-21307
Lo, B. (2015). Russia and the new world disorder. Brookings Institution Press. 342 p.
Mandelbaum, M. (2019). The new containment. Handling Russia, China and Iran. Foreign Affairs, 98(2), 123-131. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-02-12/new-containment
Mearsheimer, J. (2019). Bound to fail: the rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7-50. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00342
Munich Security Report 2020. (2020). Munich security conference, MSC. 102 p. https://securityconference.org/assets/user_upload/MunichSecurityReport2020.pdf
Nye, J.S., Jr. (2011). Has economic power replaced military might? CNN.com, 06.06. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/has-economic-power-replaced-military-might
Nye, J.S., Jr. (2019). The rise and fall of American hegemony from Wilson to Trump. International Affairs, 95(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiy212
Paul, T.V., Wirtz, J.J., Fortmann, M. (Ed.). (2004). Balance of power. Theory and practice in 21st century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 400 p.
Renz, B. (2016). Why Russia is reviving its conventional military power. Parameters: Journal of the US Army War College, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2918
Russian strategic intensions. 2019. A strategic multilayer assessment (SMA). White piper. https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/SMA-Russian-Strategic-Intensions-White-Paper-PDFcompressed.pdf
The importance of military power in 21-st century. (2018). International Strategic Analysis, 09.05. https://www.isaworld.com/news/?tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=411&cHash=3c3785562e-7d5a836189b87d09c8182e
Trenin, D. (2019). 20 years of Vladimir Putin: how Russian foreign policy has changed. The Moscow Times, 27.08. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/08/27/20-years-of-vladimir-putin-how-russianforeign-policy-has-changed-a67043
Waltz, K. (2000). Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41. http://www.columbia.edu/itc/sipa/U6800/readings-sm/Waltz_Structural%20Realism.pdf
Wright, T. (2018). The return to great-power rivalry was inevitable. The Atlantic, 12.09. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/09/liberal-order-free-world-trump-authoritarianism/569881
Arbatov, A. (2013). Real and imaginary threats. Russia in Global Affairs, 11(1), 22-39. (In Russ.) https://globalaffairs.ru/number/ugrosy-realnye-i-mnimye-15863
arabanov, M.S., Makienko, K.V., & Pukhov, R.N. (2012). Voennaya reforma: na puti k novomu obliku rossiiskoi armii. Analiticheskii doklad Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba “Valdai” [Military reform: on the way to a new image of the Russian army. Analytical report of the Valdai international discussion club].\Moscow: Fond razvitiya i podderzhki Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba “Valdai”. 36 p. (In Russ.) https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/reports/voennaya-reforma
Karaganov, S. (2012). Why weapons? Russia in Global Affairs, 10(5), 8-22. (In Russ.) https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/zachem-oruzhie
Karaganov, S.A. (2019). Departure of military superiority of the West, and geo-economics. Polis. Political Studies, 6, 8-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.06.02
Kuvaldin, V. (2021). Globalization and nation-state: yesterday, today, tomorrow. World Economy and International Relations, 65(1), 5-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-1-5-13
Mirkin, Ya.M. (2016). Foreign policy in the case of the economy. Russia in Global Affairs, 14(1), 8-22. (In Russ.) https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/vneshnya-politika-v-futlyare-ekonomiki
Mironyuk, M., Toloknev, K., & Maltsev, A. (2018). Not so obsolete military power in world politics. International Trends, 16(2), 26-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2018.16.2.53.2
Shakhalilov, Sh.Sh. (2020). Modern Western studies at the new stage of the world order crisis. World Economy and International Relations, 64(4), 96-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-4-96-105
Suchkov, M., & Tehk, S. (2019). Budushchee voiny. Doklad Mezhdunarodnogo diskussionnogo kluba “Valdai” [The future of war. Report of the Valdai international discussion club]. Moscow: Valdai. 24 p. (In Russ.) https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/reports/budushchee-voyny
Content No. 5, 2022
See also:
Battler A.,
National Interests, National and International Security. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No4
Shebanova M.A.,
International bureaucracy as the stratum of transnational political elites. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No1
Arbatov A.G.,
Nuclear reloading and international security. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3
Chugrov S.V.,
Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics: 5 years on track. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No5
Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Dudnik V.M., Blagovolin S.V., Zolotaryov P.S., Gareyev M.A., Shaposhnikov Ye.I., Bel’kov O.A., Arbatov A.G., Khalosha B.M., Kalyadin A.N., Berezovsky N.Yu., Amel’ko N.N., Kuklina I.N., Tatarnikov V.M., Ivanov P.L.,
National Interests of Russia and Her Military Policy (A Session of the Army and Society Round Table): V.M. Dudnik, S.E. Blagovolin, P.S. Zolotaryov, M.A. Gareyev, Ye.I. Shaposhnikov, O.A. Belkov, A.G. Arbatov, B.M. Khalosha, A.N. Kalyadin, N.Yu. Berezov. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No4
.jpg)
.jpg)