Managing liberal democracy – influence of secret elite networks in U.S. governments 1901-2021
Osaka University, Suita, Japan, firstname.lastname@example.org
Article received: 2021.06.21. Accepted: 2022.08.03
Etzrodt Ch. Managing liberal democracy – influence of secret elite networks in U.S. governments 1901-2021. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 6. P. 7-22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.06.02
The aim of this paper is to contribute to research on the role of elite networks in democracies. The specific research topic is an attempt to measure (for the first time) the influence of different elite networks on U.S. government administrations from 1901 to 2021. The strategy is based on the identification of U.S. government officials, who were also members of secret elite networks during their time in office. To this end, each government position received an influence value based on its importance. If an official in this position was also a member of an elite network, then the influence of the position is counted towards the influence of the network. The total influence of a network is divided by the total influence of all government positions in order to receive its relative influence score in a given administration. The results show that Freemasons had a strong influence on most U.S. governments until 1953, whereas the Anglo-American Network, with its most prominent arm, the Council on Foreign Relations, became the dominant force from Eisenhower onward. Only Nixon’s first cabinet and Donald Trump constituted exceptions thereafter, relying less heavily on this network. The implication of this study is that it is impossible to understand American history or World history in the last 120 years without also analyzing the role and interests of elite networks, given their consistent and surprisingly high level of influence, as revealed by this study.
Allerfeldt, K. (2012). Jayhawker fraternities: masons, klansmen and Kansas in the 1920s. Journal of American Studies, 46(4), 1035-1053. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875812000734
Altheide, D.L., & Grimes J.N. (2005). War programming. Sociological Quarterly, 46, 617-643.
Austin, A. (2005). War hawks and the ugly American. In B. Hamm (Ed.), Devastating Society (pp. 47-66). London: Pluto Press.
Baker, A.P. (2002). The pilgrims of Great Britain. London: Profile Books.
Bauer, C. (2016). Skulls and Bones: America’s most powerful and mysterious secret society. Maplewood, NJ: Maplewood Publishing.
Boot, M. (2004). Myths about neoconservatism. In I. Stelzer (Ed.), The Neocon Reader (pp. 43-52). New York: Grove Press.
Bowman, S. (2018). The pilgrims society and public diplomacy, 1895-1945. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Brown, R. (2015). The secret society. Cape Town: Penguin Books.
Cotton, J. (2018). On the Chatham House project. International Politics, 55, 820-835. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41311-017-0100-6
De Los Reyes, G., & Rich, P. (2005). Opus Dei and Mexico – civil but sinister? Review of Policy Research, 22(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00121.x
Denslow, W.R. (1957). 10,000 famous freemasons. Richmond: Macoy Publishing.
Dice, M. (2015). The Bilderberg group. San Diego: The Resistance.
Docherty, G., & Macgregor, J. (2013). Hidden history. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing.
Elsässer. L., Hense, S., & Schäfer, A. (2017). „Dem Deutschen Volke“? Die ungleiche Responsivität des Bundestags. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaften, 27, 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-017-0097-9
Evans, R. (1996). Register of Rhodes scholars 1903-1995. Oxford: Rhodes Trust.
Gilens, M., & Page, B.I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564-581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595
Gill, S. (1990). American hegemony and the Trilateral commission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gijswijt, T.W. (2019). Informal alliance. London: Routledge.
Gist, N.P. (1938). Structure and process in secret societies. Social Forces, 16(3), 349-357.
Grose, P. (2006). Continuing the inquiry – the council on foreign relations from 1921 to 1996. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Harland-Jacobs, J.L. (1999). “Hands across the sea” – the masonic network, British imperialism, and the North Atlantic world. Geographical Review, 89(2), 237-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12333
Harland-Jacobs, J.L. (2007). Builders of empire – freemasonry and British imperialism, 1717-1927. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Harwood, W.S. (1897). Secret societies in America. The North American Review, 164(486), 617-624. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25118819
Hertel-Fernandez, A., Skocpol, T., & Sclar J. (2018). When political mega-donors join forces. Studies in American Political Development, 32, 127-165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X18000081
Hänni, A. (2016). Ein Forum konservativer Machteliten im transatlantischen Raum. In B. Wendt et al. (Ed.), Wie Eliten Macht organisieren (pp. 118-130). Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.
Hutchinson, R. (2006). Their kingdom come – inside the secret world of Opus Dei. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
Jackson, J. (2015). The world’s most dangerous secret societies. Jersey City: Make Profits Easy.
Keefe, E.K. et al. (1976). Area handbook for Spain. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
López Rodó, L. (1965). Spain and the E.C.C. Foreign Affairs, 44(1), 127-133.
Mayer, J. (2016). Dark money. New York: Anchor Books.
Millegan, K. (ed.) (2008). Fleshing out Skull & Bones. Walterville: TrineDay.
Parmar, I. (1995). The issue of state power. Journal of American Studies, 29(1), 73-95.
Parmar, I. (2004). Think tanks and power in foreign policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Payne, S.G. (1971). In the twilight of the Franco era. Foreign Affairs, 49(2), 342-354.
Quigley, C. (1981). The Anglo-American establishment. San Pedro: GSG & Associates.
Richardson, I.N., Kakabadse, A.P., & Kakabadse N.K. (2011). Bilderberg people. London: Routledge.
Roberts, P. (2015). A century of international affairs think tanks in historical perspective. International Journal, 70(4), 535-555.
Rockefeller, D. (2002). Memoirs. New York: Random House.
Santoro, C.M. (2018). Diffidence and ambivalence. London: Routledge.
Schmidt, A.J., & Babchuk, N. (1972). Formal voluntary organizations and change over time – a study of American fraternal associations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1(1), 46-53.
Schweickart, D. (2019). Against democracy? Journal of Social Philosophy, 50(4), 664-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12317
Shepherd, H. (2020). Forging foreign policy. Social Science History, 44, 771-799. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2020.30
Shoup, L.H. (2015). Wall street’s think tank. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Shoup, L.H., & Minter, W. (2004). Imperial brain trust. New York: Authors Choice Press.
Sire, H.J.A. (2016). The knights of Malta. London: Third Millennium Publishing.
Sklar, H. (1980). Founding the Trilateral commission. In Holly Sklar (Ed.), Trilateralism (pp. 76-82). Boston: South End Press.
Skocpol, T., & Hertel-Fernandez, A. (2016). The Koch network and Republican party extremism. Perspectives on Politics, 14(3), 681-699. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716001122
Stelzer, I. (2004). Neoconservatives and their Critics. In I. Stelzer (Ed.), The Neocon Reader (pp. 3-28).
Tabbert, M.A. (2005). American freemasons. Lexington: National Heritage Museum.
Wala, M. (1990). Winning the peace. Stuttgart: Steiner.
Walsh, M. (2004). Opus Dei. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.
Zielinski, A.M. (2016). Mosaiksteine zu einer Archäologie der Bilderberg-Konferenzen. In B. Wendt et al. (Ed.), Wie Eliten Macht organisieren (pp. 157-170). Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.
Conceptual Principles of Composing Teaching Programs in International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No3
Structuring Political Science and International Relations Article in View of Science Information Quality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No1
Veselovsky S.S., Lebedeva M.M., Miteva V.V., Nikitina Yu.A.,
Competence Approach in Training Bachelors in the Field of International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No3
The Council of the State Duma: Real Veto Player or a Technical Executive?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No2
Clientelism and Informal Networks of Regional Elites in Russia: Network Analysis of the Case of Sverdlovsk Oblast. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No6