Polis. Political Studies

The editorial team of “Polis. Political Studies” proceeds from the assumption that each Journal’s reviewer commits to the following ethical principles of peer review:

– Reviewer cannot be: a member of an established scientific team, which authors of a reviewed manuscript (or their frequent co-author in other works) belong to; scientific adviser (scientific consultant) of any of the authors – applicants for an academic degree.

–  Manuscripts are reviewed only by experts in corresponding subdisciplines.

–  Review should contain an objective and profound analysis of scientific article, its academic and methodological strong and weak points.

– Reviewer must not use information on manuscript’s content before its publication in his own interests.

–  Reviewed article is a confidential document which cannot be distributed to third parties for consideration or discussion. In case of conflict of interests, the editorial team should be notified immediately.

See also:

Publication Ethics

Authors’ Ethical Principles



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
2 2003

Zhuravsky A.V.
Difficult Questions of the Modern Development

 The article text ( )


   2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991