.jpg)
printThe reform of the Common European Asylum System in the context of the implementation the EU principle of solidarity
Voynikov V.V.,
MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia; Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia, voinicov@yandex.ru
elibrary_id: 289726 | ORCID: 0000-0003-1495-3227 | RESEARCHER_ID: E-4806-2018
Article received: 2023.01.26. Accepted: 2023.06.28
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.01.11
EDN: OWUYAW
Rubric: Orbis terrarum
For citation:
Voynikov V.V. The reform of the Common European Asylum System in the context of the implementation the EU principle of solidarity. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 1. P. 149-162. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.01.11. EDN: OWUYAW
Abstract
The polycrisis in the European Union has a great influence on the issue of solidarity. The events of recent years demonstrate a significant lack of solidarity within the EU. At the same time, solidarity is one of the principles of the Union’s immigration and asylum policy, as well as one of its key value. For a long time, it was assumed that all member states act in the spirit of mutual solidarity, which should flow from the very fact of a country’s membership in the EU. In other words, international solidarity within the Union is based on voluntariness, which does not require any special mechanism for its implementation. However, in recent years, this presumption has shown its inconsistency, and as a result, the idea has arisen to create a special solidarity mechanism. The migration crisis of 2015 forced the institutions of the Union to start reforming the Common European Asylum System, a key element of which is the creation of an effective solidarity mechanism within the Union. This article is devoted to the study of the transformation of the solidarity principle in the framework of the reform of the Common European Asylum System. The article highlights the main stages of the protracted reform of asylum legislation, reveals the key features of each stage from a solidarity perspective. The author comes to the conclusion that the proposed asylum system in the EU will not become fairer and will not ensure the implementation of the principle of solidarity. At the same time, the reform of the asylum policy could lead to an increase in the centralization of this policy and the expansion of the powers of the Union bodies, which will not make it possible to resolve the current problems and provide solidarity. Thus, solidarity will turn out to be only a tool in the hands of the institutions of the Union for carrying out planned reforms. According to the author, at the moment one can observe the transformation of solidarity within the EU into collectivism, when the interests of the Union are put above the interests of the member states, and the latter are forced to follow a common policy against their will.
Keywords
solidarity, European Union, migration, asylum, immigration crisis, Schengen area, Pact on Migration and Asylum, Dublin Regulation.
References
Ciornei, I., & Recchi, E. (2017). At the source of European solidarity: assessing the effects of cross-border practices and political attitudes. JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3), 468-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12507
De Bruycker, P. (2022). The new pact on migration and asylum: what it is not and what it could have been. In D. Thym (Ed.), Reforming the Common European Asylum System: Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum (pp. 33-42). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748931164-33
Goldberg, A.C., Gattermann, K., Marquart, F., Brosius, & A. de Vreese, C.H. (2021). European solidarity in times of crisis: the role of information and media use. West European Politics, 44(5-6), 1314-1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1884398
Grimmel, A. (2020). “Le Grand absent Européen”: solidarity in the politics of European integration. Acta Politica, 56(20), 242-260. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00171-7
Katsanidou, A., Reinl, A.-K., & Eder, C. (2022). Together we stand? Transnational solidarity in the EU in times of crises. European Union Politics, 23(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165211035663
Maiani, F. (2022). Into the loop: the doomed reform of Dublin and solidarity in the new pact. In D. Thym (Ed.), Reforming the Common European Asylum System: Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum (pp. 43-60). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748931164-43
Marin, L. (2020). Waiting (and paying) for Godot: analyzing the systemic consequences of the solidarity crisis in EU asylum law. European Journal of Migration and Law, 22(1), 60-81. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340069
Sanchez Salgado, R.M. (2021). Emotions in the European Union’s decision-making: the reform of the Dublin system in the context of the refugee crisis. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(1), 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1968355
Sangiovanni, A. (2013). Solidarity in the European Union. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(2), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqs033
Schimmelfennig, F. (2018). European Integration (theory) in times of crisis. A comparison of the euro and Schengen crises. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(7), 969-989. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1421252
Thym, D. (2022). Never-ending story? Political dynamics, legislative uncertainties, and practical drawbacks of the ‘new’ pact on migration and asylum. In D. Thym (Ed.), Reforming the Common European Asylum System: Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum (pp. 11-32). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748931164-11
Wolthuis, B. (2021). The European Union between solidarity and justice. Acta Politica, 56, 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00152-w
Zeitlin, J., Nicoli, F., & Laffan, B. (2019). Introduction: the European Union beyond the polycrisis? Integration and politicization in an age of shifting cleavages. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 963-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1619803
Arbatova, N.K. (2022). Migrattion threat to EU security: prejudices and realities. World Economy and International Relations, 66(2), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-2-61-70. (In Russ.)
Entin, M.L. (2009). EU as a Key global player. International Organisations Research Journal, 4(2), 29-47. (In Russ.)
Malakhov, V.S., & Kascian, K.A. (2020). The EU’s migration dilemma: legal and political dimensions. Polis. Political Studies, 4, 139-151. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.04.10.
Podvojskaya, I.V. (2011). Ponyatiya “Kollektivizm” i “Sobornost’”, ikh interpretatsii i sootnoshenie. Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk state pedagogical university named after V.P. Astafyev (Bulletin KSPU), 1, 140-144. (In Russ.)
Potemkina, O.Yu. (2016). Visegrad group and “flexible solidarity”. Contemporary Europe, 6, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope620164352. (In Russ.)
Potemkina, O.Yu. (2022). Pact on migration and asylum – how far from the end? Evropeiskii soyuz: fakty i kommentarii (online edition), 109, 61-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/eufacts320226164. (In Russ.)
Potemkina, O.Yu. (2023). “Failing forward”: freedom of movement reforms in the European Union during crises. Contemporary Europe, 1, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0201708323010011. (In Russ.)
Voynikov, V.V. (2017). The reform of EU asylum law as a response to the Europe’s migration crisis. Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, 12(5), 149-169. (In Russ.)
Content No. 1, 2024
See also:
Malakhov V.S., Kascian K.,
The EU’s Migration Dilemma: Legal and Political Dimensions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No4
Bardin A.L.,
The Problem of Migration in German Academic Discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No6
Tsapenko I.P.,
The Afghan migration crisis and U.S. policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No1
Vainshtein G.I.,
Demography factor of the «social state» evolution in Europe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6
Suvakovic U.,
Political parties as traditional mechanisms of representation in modern societies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2
.jpg)
.jpg)
